Update CHANGES on trunk for abcl-1.3.0 releng.

parent 1b017a8b
Version 1.3.0-dev
=================
http://abcl.org/svn/trunk/abcl
Unreleased
## Features
* ASDF 3.0.3.0.3 shipped with the implementation
* per function call stack and memory exception handler in CL:COMPILE
[???]
* Make LispStackFrame?.UNAVAILABLE_ARG a singleton object,
Memory profiling of ABCL shows that the classes with largest
allocation count are org.armedbear.lisp.LispStackFrame and
org.armedbear.lisp.LispStackFrame.UnavailableArgument.
Contributed by Dmitry Nadezhin.
[r14572]: http://abcl.org/trac/changeset/14572
[r14579]: http://abcl.org/trac/changeset/14579
* SYS:SHA256 audited
The functionality if the SYS:SHA256 algorithim has been audited for
use on inputs of single for files with recently shipping ORCL Java 7
implementations (through jdk-1.7.0_45).
[r14582]: http://abcl.org/trac/changeset/14582
## Compatbility
### Contrib
#### abcl-asdf
[#328]: http://abcl.org/trac/ticket/328
Working with both Maven 3.0.x and 3.1.x. Thanks to Anton for the
help!
#### jna
Now references jna-4.0.0. Some incompatibility with CFFI ([in
progress with fixing upstream][1]).
[1]: http://slack.net/~evenson/abcl/cffi/encoding.diff
Version 1.2.1
=============
http//abcl.org/svn/tags/1.2.1/abcl/CHANGES
......
......@@ -20,14 +20,15 @@
dc:identifier <urn:abcl.org/1.3.0#dev> ;
doap:language "Common Lisp" ;
dc:created "01-JAN-2004" ;
dc:modified "31-MAY-2013" ;
dc:modified "09-NOV-2013" ;
dc:version "abcl-1.3.0" ;
abcl:release "dev" .
<>
rdfs:seeAlso <file:README> ;
rdfs:seeAlso <file:MANUAL> ;
rdfs:seeAlso <file:doc/manual/abcl.tex> .
rdfs:seeAlso <file:CHANGES> ;
rdfs:seeAlso <file:doc/manual/abcl.tex> .
@prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/> .
......@@ -40,7 +41,6 @@
doap:shortname "ABCL" ;
abcl:contributors """ehu easye v-ille astalla rudi peter""" .
<abcl:doap> doap:language "Common Lisp" .
<> <urn:abcl.org:releng:implementation:language> [
......@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@
rdf:_4 "Windows Batch Script"
] .
<abcl:doap>
dc:contributor [
a rdf:Bag;
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment