Commit 67f56580 authored by Francois-Rene Rideau's avatar Francois-Rene Rideau

Remove mentions of LispWorks only providing ASDF 2 -- it now has ASDF 3!

parent 24758e55
......@@ -26,12 +26,11 @@ It notably doesn't work on:
* mocl, that doesn't support ASDF 3 yet.
* Corman Lisp, RMCL, Genera, that are obsolete anyway.
Note that if you're using it with LispWorks (known to only provide ASDF 2
as of LispWorks 6.1 in 2015), you first have to create a command-line
executable for LispWorks this way:
Note that if you're using it with LispWorks, you first have to create
a command-line executable for LispWorks this way:
echo '(hcl:save-image "lispworks-console" :environment nil)' > si.lisp
lispworks-6-1-0-x86-linux -siteinit - -init - -build si.lisp
lispworks-7-0-0-x86-linux -siteinit - -init - -build si.lisp
|#
#+gcl
......
......@@ -42,12 +42,12 @@
(ignore-errors (and (probe-file x) (load x))))
(load-and-configure-asdf ()
;; First, try to require ASDF from the implementation, if not already loaded.
;; Most implementations provide ASDF 3.0, LispWorks still lags with ASDF 2.019,
;; and some unmaintained implementations, or obsolete implementations or versions thereof
;; only provide ASDF 2, ASDF 1, or don't provide ASDF.
;; All actively maintained implementations now provide ASDF 3.0;
;; some old versions of maintained implementations, and some unmaintained
;; or obsolete implementations only provide ASDF 2, ASDF 1, or don't provide ASDF.
;; Note that CLISP is case-sensitive, so we need to specify a lowercase string,
;; and not the keyword :asdf or symbol 'asdf; old CLISP versions that don't provide ASDF
;; may error at compile-time if we call (require "asdf") directly.
;; and not the keyword :asdf or symbol 'asdf; also old CLISP versions that don't
;; provide ASDF may error at compile-time if we call (require "asdf") directly.
(ignore-errors (funcall 'require "asdf"))
;; If ASDF 2 isn't provided, load our ASDF from source.
;; ASDF 1 is not enough, because it won't heed our project's output-translations.
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment