Commit 77640721 authored by Francois-Rene Rideau's avatar Francois-Rene Rideau

2.30.3: punt on ECL upgrade after problems with cl-test-grid.

Export component-loaded-p. Update some docstrings.
parent 461953f8
......@@ -93,17 +93,19 @@ You can put together sentences using this phrase."))
"Returns a list of dependencies needed by the component to perform
the operation. A dependency has one of the following forms:
(<operation> <component>*), where <operation> is a class
designator and each <component> is a component
designator, which means that the component depends on
(<operation> <component>*), where <operation> is an operation designator
with respect to FIND-OPERATION in the context of the OPERATION argument,
and each <component> is a component designator with respect to
FIND-COMPONENT in the context of the COMPONENT argument,
and means that the component depends on
<operation> having been performed on each <component>; or
(FEATURE <feature>), which means that the component depends
on <feature>'s presence in *FEATURES*.
on the <feature> expression satisfying FEATUREP.
(This is DEPRECATED -- use :IF-FEATURE instead.)
Methods specialized on subclasses of existing component types
should usually append the results of CALL-NEXT-METHOD to the
list."))
should usually append the results of CALL-NEXT-METHOD to the list."))
(defgeneric component-self-dependencies (operation component))
(define-convenience-action-methods component-depends-on (operation component))
(define-convenience-action-methods component-self-dependencies (operation component))
......
......@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
:licence "MIT"
:description "Another System Definition Facility"
:long-description "ASDF builds Common Lisp software organized into defined systems."
:version "2.30.2" ;; to be automatically updated by make bump-version
:version "2.30.3" ;; to be automatically updated by make bump-version
:depends-on ()
#+asdf3 :encoding #+asdf3 :utf-8
;; For most purposes, asdf itself specially counts as a builtin system.
......
......@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
(define-condition duplicate-names (system-definition-error)
((name :initarg :name :reader duplicate-names-name))
(:report (lambda (c s)
(format s (compatfmt "~@<Error while defining system: multiple components are given same name ~A~@:>")
(format s (compatfmt "~@<Error while defining system: multiple components are given same name ~S~@:>")
(duplicate-names-name c)))))
(defun sysdef-error-component (msg type name value)
......
;;; -*- mode: Common-Lisp; Base: 10 ; Syntax: ANSI-Common-Lisp -*-
;;; This is ASDF 2.30.2: Another System Definition Facility.
;;; This is ASDF 2.30.3: Another System Definition Facility.
;;;
;;; Feedback, bug reports, and patches are all welcome:
;;; please mail to <asdf-devel@common-lisp.net>.
......@@ -71,8 +71,7 @@
(existing-version-number (and existing-version (read-from-string existing-major-minor)))
(away (format nil "~A-~A" :asdf existing-version)))
(when (and existing-version (< existing-version-number
#+abcl 2.25 #+clisp 2.27 #+clozure 2.27
#+cmu 2.018 #+ecl 2.21 #+xcl 2.27))
(or #+abcl 2.25 #+cmu 2.018 2.27)))
(rename-package :asdf away)
(when *load-verbose*
(format t "; Renamed old ~A package away to ~A~%" :asdf away))))))
......
......@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
#:monolithic-load-compiled-concatenated-source-op
#:operation-monolithic-p
#:required-components
#:component-loaded-p
#:component #:parent-component #:child-component #:system #:module
#:file-component #:source-file #:c-source-file #:java-source-file
......
......@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ You can compare this string with e.g.: (ASDF:VERSION-SATISFIES (ASDF:ASDF-VERSIO
;; "3.4.5.67" would be a development version in the official upstream of 3.4.5.
;; "3.4.5.0.8" would be your eighth local modification of official release 3.4.5
;; "3.4.5.67.8" would be your eighth local modification of development version 3.4.5.67
(asdf-version "2.30.2")
(asdf-version "2.30.3")
(existing-version (asdf-version)))
(setf *asdf-version* asdf-version)
(when (and existing-version (not (equal asdf-version existing-version)))
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment