From a15826079090bccf6eb48cb11d28fe65ec21a5dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Raymond Toy <toy.raymond@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 12:57:07 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Revert e15cd9fa

Don't print BREAK as INT3 because it looks funny.  The disassembly
looks like

      INT3    <code>

instead of

      BREAK   <code>

To do this properly requires a lot more work to get the code printed
on the next line and also getting the disassembler to recognize the
break case.
---
 src/compiler/x86/insts.lisp | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/compiler/x86/insts.lisp b/src/compiler/x86/insts.lisp
index 980ed828a..c0f10342d 100644
--- a/src/compiler/x86/insts.lisp
+++ b/src/compiler/x86/insts.lisp
@@ -2105,7 +2105,6 @@
 (define-instruction break (segment code)
   (:declare (type (unsigned-byte 8) code))
   (:printer byte-imm ((op #b11001100)) '(:name :tab code)
-	    :print-name 'int3
 	    :control #'break-control)
   (:emitter
    (emit-byte segment #b11001100)
-- 
GitLab