From a15826079090bccf6eb48cb11d28fe65ec21a5dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Toy <toy.raymond@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 12:57:07 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Revert e15cd9fa Don't print BREAK as INT3 because it looks funny. The disassembly looks like INT3 <code> instead of BREAK <code> To do this properly requires a lot more work to get the code printed on the next line and also getting the disassembler to recognize the break case. --- src/compiler/x86/insts.lisp | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/compiler/x86/insts.lisp b/src/compiler/x86/insts.lisp index 980ed828a..c0f10342d 100644 --- a/src/compiler/x86/insts.lisp +++ b/src/compiler/x86/insts.lisp @@ -2105,7 +2105,6 @@ (define-instruction break (segment code) (:declare (type (unsigned-byte 8) code)) (:printer byte-imm ((op #b11001100)) '(:name :tab code) - :print-name 'int3 :control #'break-control) (:emitter (emit-byte segment #b11001100) -- GitLab