o Change the def-type-translator for COMPLEX to fix some confusion in
the compiler about what COMPLEX and (COMPLEX REAL) are. They should be the same. - Make (COMPLEX *) be the same as (COMPLEX REAL), because we were creating a plain COMPLEX, which isn't what we want. - If the typespec is a subtype of RATIONAL, return (COMPLEX RATIONAL). o Make (COMPLEX REAL) print out as COMPLEX instead of as a union of specialized complex types. o Modify CTYPE-OF-NUMBER so that it no longer creates (COMPLEX (INTEGER low high)) types; these are now (COMPLEX RATIONAL). This fixes a bug where (type-of #c(0 1/2)) was giving an error. (This is fixes the bug by removing the offending code. But do we really want and need to support (COMPLEX INTEGER) types in the compiler? Shouldn't (COMPLEX RATIONAL) be good enough?)
Please register or sign in to comment