Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Register
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
A
asdf
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Didier Verna
asdf
Commits
03a7774a
Commit
03a7774a
authored
12 years ago
by
Francois-Rene Rideau
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Fix the test script again.
parent
39ca5aef
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
test/run-tests.sh
+6
-4
6 additions, 4 deletions
test/run-tests.sh
with
6 additions
and
4 deletions
test/run-tests.sh
+
6
−
4
View file @
03a7774a
...
...
@@ -283,12 +283,13 @@ valid_upgrade_test_p () {
abcl:1.
*
|
abcl:2.00[0-9]:
*
|
abcl:201[0-9]:
*
|
abcl:2.2[0-3]:
*
)
:
;;
# ccl fasl numbering broke loading of old asdf 2.0
ccl:2.0[01]
*
)
:
;;
# my old ubuntu clisp 2.44.1 is wired in with an antique ASDF 1.374 from CLC that can't be downgraded.
# my old ubuntu clisp 2.44.1 is wired in
# with an antique ASDF 1.374 from CLC that can't be downgraded.
# 2.00[0-7] use UID, which fails on that CLISP and was removed afterwards.
# Note that for the longest time, CLISP has included 2.011 in its distribution.
# Since we punt on the upgrade, let's only do the test once, for 2.26.
clisp:2.00[0-7]:
*
|
clisp:1.
*
|
clisp:2.0[01]
*
|
clisp:2.2[0-5]:
*
)
:
;;
# Skip, CMUCL has problems before 2.014.7 due to source-registry upgrade
# Skip, CMUCL has problems before 2.014.7 due to source-registry upgrade
.
# Weird unidentified problems before 2.018, so we punt equally for everything before,
# and only need to test it once: above, for 2.017.
cmucl:1.
*
|
cmucl:2.00
*
|
cmucl:2.01[0-6]:
*
)
:
;;
...
...
@@ -298,7 +299,8 @@ valid_upgrade_test_p () {
gcl:1.
*
|
gcl:2.0
*
|
gcl:2.2[0-6]
*
)
:
;;
# MKCL is only supported starting with 2.24, so skip earlier versions
mkcl:1.
*
|
mkcl:2.0[01]
*
|
mkcl:2.2[0-3]:
*
)
:
;;
# XCL support starts with ASDF 2.014.2 - It also dies during upgrade trying to show the backtrace.
# XCL support starts with ASDF 2.014.2
# — It also dies during upgrade trying to show the backtrace.
xcl:1.
*
|
xcl:2.00
*
|
xcl:2.01[0-4]:
*
|
xcl:
*
)
:
;;
*
)
return
0
;;
esac
...
...
@@ -355,7 +357,7 @@ test_clean_load () {
'(or #.(load "test/script-support.lisp" :verbose nil :print nil) #.(asdf-test::exit-lisp 0))'
\
>
$nop
2>&1
${
cmd
}
${
eval
}
\
'(or #.(load "test/script-support.lisp" :verbose nil :print nil)
(asdf-test::load-
asdf
-
lisp
) #.(asdf-test::exit-lisp
0))'
\
'(or #.(load "test/script-support.lisp" :verbose nil :print nil)
#.(load "build/
asdf
.
lisp
" :verbose nil) #.(asdf/image:quit
0))'
\
>
$load
2>&1
if
diff
$nop
$load
;
then
echo
"GOOD: Loading ASDF on
$lisp
produces no message"
>
&2
;
return
0
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment